Franzen's metaphorical language Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Franzens metaphorical language - Essay ExampleThat security cameras no bigger than spiders are watching from every shaded corner allows the reader to go through a similar situation in mind as they may not have seen cameras that small, but they must have most definitely let across the creepy crawlies. He starts off by quoting several other generators who have the same to say. It convinces the reader that since there is more than one person who thinks in a similar direction, then there must be some truth in what Franzen is saying. Thus, the reader may give a chance to what the writer has to say and maybe, by the end of the article, even agree with him. He, himself though, seems to be annoyed with the invasion of concealment. It is abhorrent to him to be reading about the personal lives of others and does not urgency the same to happen to him was that my own loneliness not Clintons, not Lewinskys was being violated. () What I felt, I felt personally. I was being intruded on. He talks about how most of us may not be much affected by the complete lack of privacy we have. The panic about privacy has all the finger-pointing and paranoia of a good old American scare, but its missing one vital ingredient a genuinely dismay public. Americans care about privacy mainly in the abstract. It is possible that this is because we have not been that overly distressed with the amount of our information which is out in the public. though some may, of course, be angry over the same point as they may have been greatly negatively influenced by it. On the whole though, privacy proves to be the Cheshire cat of values not much substance, but a very winning smile. The writer brings in the much famed sham character of Lewis Carolls to make the comparison of what privacy really is in the animation of an average human being. There is great hype over the essential of it but to most really having it does not matter much. Franzen does seem to be fair though. He brings in both the si des of the arguments that privacy seems to be important to us and yet when our particular details are out in the open, it may make our lives much easier to live by. I resent the security cameras in the cap Square, but I appreciate the ones on a subway platform. These cameras do take away a measure of privacy but they also help oneself in keeping the people safe, and nobody would complain about that. In the beginning, if our private life is being watched over, it does not matter much as ample as we do not feel it. We may be perfectly fine with strangers knowing pieces of information about us, but it is personal when someone we in reality know finds out something about us. But our respective privacies remain intact as long as neither of us feels seen. And when anything personal about our life is plastered all over the newspapers and televisions, crying out to the world to notice and see them, then that is when we feel that the limits have been crossed. We are no longer joyful wit h the situation of how our life seems to be a book or movie for everyone to watch or read and give their opinions about my disgust was of a variant order, from my partisan disgust at the news that the Giants have blown a fourth quarter lead.